On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 21:52:27 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Author: bz
Date: Wed Nov 26 20:52:26 2008
New Revision: 185344
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/185344
Log:
Remove in6_pcbdetach() as it is exactly the same function
as in_pcbdetach() and we don't need the code twice.
Reviewed by: rwatson
MFC after: 6 weeks (*)
(*) possibly need to leave a stub wrapper in 7 to keep the symbol.
Won't this affect our ability to build INET6, but non INET kernels? Not
that we currently could, but if we ever wanted to?
INET6 already depends on other things in_pcb.c directly, such as
in_pcballoc(). The distinction made between struct inpcb and struct in6pcb is
artificial, and mostly quite confusing, so we've been gradually eliminating
it. It's largely incompatible with the implementation of IPv4 addresses
mapped into the IPv6 space, which relies on IPv6 sockets being able to be in
IPv4 connection lists, etc. We have long-term plans to eliminate most of the
macro aliasing of fields between the one structure.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
