Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > style(9) doesn't allow the C99 declaration since C99 hasn't noticed that > C99 exists.
I vote for style(9)'s continued ignorance of C99 declarations. The only case in which I can see a net benefit is for one-off loop variables, and even there the benefit is probably not sufficient to justify the loss of compatibility with older compilers. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
