On 2023-06-12, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
But my emphasis is on the question, if a decode of 3rd *and* 7th
order information - yielding in one encoded file - would be
mathematically correct if it comes to the decoding of the higher
order content. Would there be missing something (maybe an overall
lower amplitude of the third order content)?
If you do it *wrong*, you'll get spatial aliasing. This is a big part of
getting the original first order decoding equation right. It won't sound
right even in the quadraphonic LTI Makita framework which the founders
of ambisonics were aiming at.
It's even more difficult to do active decoding from there.
In the higher order content, let's talk about it in private, and then in
public. Because I know about this a bit already. Note: it's probably
about directional or locational interfence.
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3751464, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
