Hi Anna,

While there's no denying that the Zylia microphone array is a great value 
proposition, it is perhaps a bit misleading to market it based on the 
statement: "spatial resolution is not significantly improved from the 3rd to 
4th Ambisonics orders."; as this is not the full story in this case.

Speaking from a purely "spatial performance" point-of-view, if one were to 
employ the objective metrics described in [1], they would find that the 
approximate (in this case, also theoretical) usable frequency ranges per order 
are:

Zylia mic:
3rd order range: ~1600-2900Hz
2nd order range: ~700-3000Hz
1st order range: ~100-3100Hz
0th order range: -3200Hz

Eigenmike32:
4th order range: ~3000-5500Hz
3rd order range: ~1600-6000Hz
2nd order range: ~700-7000Hz
1st order range: ~100-8000Hz
0th order range: -8500Hz

Note that this is also considering a very generous maximum permitted sensor 
noise amplification limit, so expect those low-frequency roll-offs to be more 
severe for classical music performance, and nature recordings etc. depending on 
sensor noise.

I also pulled these values quickly by eye, based on the "Analyse" graphs given 
by the sparta_array2sh VST plugin, so they are only approximate, and should be 
treated as such. However, I believe they still provide sufficient insight to 
support my claim that "not all HOA mics are made equally". The frequency range 
at which you actually get these higher-order components is of significance. 
(This is also even before you start to consider the quality of the sensors and 
how they affect the reproduction fidelity).

Best,
Leo


[1] Moreau, S., Daniel, J. and Bertet, S., 2006, May. 3D sound field recording 
with higher order ambisonics–Objective measurements and validation of a 4th 
order spherical microphone. In 120th Convention of the AES (pp. 20-23).

P.S. it's also interesting to note that: should a recording engineer truncate 
and only use the FOA signals anyway (many decoders are still FOA only 
after-all), then they would have actually obtained better 0th and 1st order 
components from a traditional A-format mic, compared with the Zylia array.

P.S.2. I don't believe the Zylia encoder has any near-field compensation 
options? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if it is operating under far-field 
assumptions, then I suspect those assumptions were violated during the linked 
recording.



________________________________
From: Sursound <sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu> on behalf of anna.czerwoniec 
zylia.pl <anna.czerwon...@zylia.pl>
Sent: 16 June 2020 14:22:57
To: Surround Sound discussion group; Jens Ahrens
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Binaural rendering of an Eigenmike recording

Hi All!

Just to let you know, with the ZYLIA ZM-1 you are able to obtain similar 
results with 3rd order Ambisonics and at much lower cost. You just require the 
ZM-1 microphone and the ZYLIA Ambisonics Converter with a binaural decoder and 
then you will be able to assign the rotation and elevation of the microphone to 
the head-tracker using OSC in your DAW.

Even though the Eigenmic is a 4th Ambisonics Order microphone, it is proven 
that the spatial resolution is not significantly improved from the 3rd to 4th 
Ambisonics orders.

You can check this remake of a famous binaural audio recording
https://soundcloud.com/user-309532711/barber-shop-adam-szulc-binaural-recording-asmr-zylia

All the best,
Anna


> 21 maja 2020 18:03 Jens Ahrens <jens.ahr...@chalmers.se> napisał(a):
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> … and another post from me.
>
> Here’s a quick 2-min video of what binaural rendering of an Eigenmike 
> recording can sound like for those of you who haven’t heard this before: 
> https://youtu.be/qcqeygqjxZ4 It’s 4th order rendered directly in the 
> spherical harmonic domain (without a virtual discrete loudspeaker array). The 
> rendering was done with ReTiSAR 
> (https://github.com/AppliedAcousticsChalmers/ReTiSAR), which is generously 
> funded by Facebook Reality Labs.
>
> Best regards,
> Jens
>
> --
> Jens Ahrens
> Associate Professor
> Division of Applied Acoustics
> Chalmers University of Technology
> 41296 Gothenburg
> Sweden
> +46 (0)31 772 2210
> http://www.ta.chalmers.se/people/jens-ahrens/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
> account or options, view archives and so on.



Anna Czerwoniec, PhD
Marketing & Sales Director

Zylia Sp z o.o.
Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 2, 61 – 614 Poznań, Poland
Phone 0048 61 279 40 44,

www.zylia.co<http://www.zylia.co> (http://www.zylia.co)

https://www.facebook.com/zylia/ https://twitter.com/ZYLIA_co 
https://www.instagram.com/zylia.co/

Record audio like never before
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20200616/07ef2857/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to