Well to clarify and bring into context, I don’t own a NT-SF1, so I can’t confirm that. I just mentioned the possible artifacts which can (don’t have to) occur with time-frequency domain processing. And I also wrote that adaptive, signal dependent processing is the way to go to get the best out of FOA. A student of ours (IEM) just recently released his AdaptiveBinauralDecoder plug-in as a Beta version. Also adaptive and FOA.
Daniel > Am 17.12.2018 um 20:28 schrieb Len Moskowitz <lenmoskow...@optonline.net>: > > I wrote: > > >> There has been a report that the encoder introduces unpleasant sonic >> artifacts if the NT-SF1 is in motion during recording. Links to >> recordings made that way were posted on Facebook, and I've heard them. > > > > Daniel Rudrich confirmed that the Rode plugin produces artifacts when the > microphone is moved. > > > On Facebook he wrote: > > >> You can actually see those artifacts with encoding two sinusoids in different >> directions and look at the visualization. When you change the frequency of > >> one, there seem to be three sources. > > > Len Moskowitz (mosko...@core-sound.com) > Core Sound LLC > www.core-sound.com > Home of OctoMic and TetraMic > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit > account or options, view archives and so on. _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
