On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 05:07:15PM +0000, Enda Bates wrote:

> ... In that scenario, the TetraMic recording was definitely
> noisier, purely due to the additional gain required.

That doesn't make much sense.

Noise level (relative to signal) shouldn't increase with gain.
If it does that means the amplifier has a problem.
A well designed mic preamp will in fact have better EIN at
high gain. 

> I've heard from quite a few people that given a high end
> preamp with sufficient clean gain, that's not so much of
> an issue.

The Tetramic capsules have an acoustic noise level of 19 dB(A),
and sensitivity is 7 mV/Pa. That means the electrical noise
level is -116 dBm(A). If the EIN of the preamp is say 6 dB
or more better then most of the noise comes from the mic.  
So with an EIN of -122 dBm(A) you should be safe, and I
wouldn't call that 'high end'. 

The specs for the Motu 8m don't even mention EIN (which
isn't a good sign). The 'dynamic range' figure of 112 dB
can mean all sorts of things and is pretty useless.

Ciao,


-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to