Agreed on all counts. Dave
On 11 August 2016 at 20:17, Fons Adriaensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote: > > > Awww, come on, a bit of mental exercise is good for the soul! :-) :-) > > Agree with that. But having done that sort of mental exercise more > than once, IMHO the only good reason to inflict it on others is to > show that it's not very productive. BTW, the exercise was 3rd order > X-axis rotation. Of course, having a way to compute the N3D solution, > all it takes is to multiply the matrix left and right with the gain > factors and permutations. But there are lots of ways to get that > wrong. > > OTOH, the conversion between N3D and SN3D that Richard worries about > is simple enough, it's just one easily computed gain factor per degree. > > Ciao, > > -- > FA > > A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. > It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris > and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University. These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University Dave Malham Honorary Fellow, Department of Music The University of York York YO10 5DD UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160811/4771b834/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list [email protected] https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
