On 2016-05-10 19:50, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:32:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >>> Also in the paper it is at least suggested (Fig. 1) that the matrix >>> dimensions are 32-bit floating point, while the code uses 32-bit >>> integers (which makes sense). >> >> while it might make sense, i'm pretty sure that the implementation does >> follow the suggestion in the paper and uses 32-bit floating point for >> the embedded matrix. > > The matrix elements are of course float. But this is about the > *dimensions*.
ah yes, i overlooked that in your mail. and true, i used integers for the dimensions (as float does *not* make sense). so yes, this should be amended as well. fgsd,f IOhannes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160511/bf747381/attachment.asc> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
