It still hertz – Wireless World headline in the 60s umashankar
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Marc Lavallée<mailto:m...@hacklava.net> Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 5:40 PM To: sursound@music.vt.edu<mailto:sursound@music.vt.edu> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Anyone know anything about this? On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:00:20 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier <netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote : > On 04/07/2016 08:13 PM, Marc Lavallee wrote: > > > > The FAQ says: > > "audio is recorded in 96 KHz/16 bit quality" > > > > I would prefer 48 KHz/24 bit. > > let's not discuss matters of taste, but rather keep things scientific. > > 96/16 = 6 > 48/24 = 2 > > so theirs is clearly 3x better than yours! Of course! Hertz per bit... Or is it bit per hertz? What's better for marketing? More bits of more hertz? > (i held it during the april foolery, but now it must out :) (it's never too late for a 3 times better joke) -- Marc _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160408/9f10c545/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
