Hi Fons, _______________________________________ From: Sursound [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] on behalf of Fons Adriaensen [f...@linuxaudio.org] Sent: 27 January 2016 23:58 To: sursound@music.vt.edu Subject: Re: [Sursound] Never do math in public, or my take on explaining B-format to binaural
> plus independent decorators/reverberators per HOA channel, > with different decays at different frequencies, for the > late part. The late part filters require a further tuning > stage though, to match the ‘sinc’ like binaural-coherence > of left and right ear signals in diffuse sound. I have > found that this matching improves significantly > externalisation, and sounds more natural. I'd be much interested to learn more about that... Ciao, -- FA ________________________________________ sure I can expand on that, is it ok if I contact you or send you some text off-list? I am wondering though, as I understood, you are interested in the case of converting to binaural other multichannel formats with dynamic head-tracking. In this case since you have discrete sources you are binauralizaing, with some added room effect, is there a reason to go through a second order ambisonic system, instead of using directly HRTFs with some interpolation, plus a binaural late reverb? Don't you blur significantly (well, up to a second-order blurring) the spatial resolution of the HRTFs, considering again that we need orders of 8-15 for fullband reconstruction of HRTFs at mid and high frequencies? Regards, Archontis _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
