Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 04:26:05PM +0000, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
See:
http://www.hauptmikrofon.de/HW/TMT2012_3DNaturalRecording_Theile_Wittek_2012_11.pdf,
pg. 19.
This hedgehog layout really fits to the microphone openings of the
Ozo camera...
* The hedgehog is at least twenty times as big.
Hardly...
P. 19 of the cited article gives a value of 10 - 20 cm for the mike
distances, i.e. the value for the cube edges.
The Ozo camera is significantly bigger than 1cm, at least from a
layman's view... :-D
Anyway, Nokia gives the following specs:
262,95 x 168,36 x 157,83mm / 10.4x6.7x6.3” (camera head only)
and
262,95 x 168,36 x 238mm / 10.4x6.7x9.4” (w/ camera mount)
* It uses cardioid or supercardioid mics.
I wrote about, but also about the possible influence of the case - which
is filled with a lot of stuff, so won't be acoustically transparent.
The OZO's will
be omni over most of the frequency range and turn into
something like subcardioid only at very frequencies
(above 4 kHz or so).
And how can/could you know this?
in other words, this is an entirely different beast.
It is hard to argue in this style... Prove your point, or write "maybe"!
Best,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.
