> Somme clarifications on the discussion below: > > 1. It is indeed possible we are not very clear in our web communication. > The main reason for that is that we try to address the average consumer > and we found out that it is very difficult to explain the various abstract > concepts of ambisonic, binaural, 3Dsound ...to the general public. So far, > the term "360°" is what seems to best convey the notion of "3D Sound", > even if we all know that 360° represents a "2D" dimension in our > scientific minds ;-). We are opened to suggestion for other option ....
12.6 steradians, of course .... Michael (a ",-)>" is not, i hope, needed?) _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
