dw wrote:

The state-of-the-art finds it very difficult to render sounds below the listener. To do it with a 'flat' frequency response, and referenced to ground/gravity ie.. unaffected by normal, small head movements is a bonus. It is just a pity it might take a while to get used to.. I can't tell after being spoilt by 100s of hours of listening to various binaural recordings, and not hearing above 12kHz.

http://www.freesound.org/people/dwareing/sounds/255159/

This might be some observation worth for some serious discussion.

Elevation cues depend a lot on pinnae forms, and are related (mostly?) to high(er) frequencies.

The HRTF set you are using might just not do it for you?

Would you notice some changes if you try to find some HRTF set which actually "fits" to you? (Provided that you are probably not able to measure your personal HRTF data...)

Best,

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to