hi all!
re-reading my post, i notice that it could be construed as somewhat
hostile in tone. this was unintended, and i'd like to apologise if
anybody has taken offense.
On 09/26/2013 02:01 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 09/26/2013 09:21 AM, Kan Kaban wrote:
Our initial idea is to keep signals / conversions
into the analogue domain.
this remark probably triggered it - it feels as if you asked how to
perform a triple salto while your "initial idea is to put your feet in a
cubic yard of wet concrete and wait for it to set"... ;-D
i have the utmost respect for the circuitry wizards who could do all
this in analog electronics while i was busy waiting to be conceived.
then again, i also had the questionable pleasure to work with a mark v
soundfield processor that hadn't seen calibration and servicing in a
loong while, and the behaviour of the controls and the system as a whole
was somewhat erratic, to put it mildly.
now i understand the mark v stems from the secular period of soundfield
inc, a time where it was no longer graced by the wharfedale virgins and
calrec wizards. even so, doing this in analog, today, for anything else
than enacting a zen koan to enlighten apprentices, seems decidedly weird...
all the best,
jörn
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
