Oh well, just finish it, probably better not to return it to the cellar :-)

   Enjoy
            Dave

On 24 June 2013 20:35, Michael Chapman <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> Interesting - I found the letter through the Uni's electronic journals
> >> access. Peter used both "ambisonic" and "ambiphonic"  ( _not_
> >> "Ambiophonic"
> >> !) in that letter. However, I was then able to go back to his letter in
> >> the
> >> Feb 8 1973 of that Journal and found that that one also contained
> >> "ambisonics" and, not only that, but it also discusses the use of phase
> >> shift based matrix technologies to get two channel representations (ie
> >>  what became uhj) - moreover the letter is actually dated November 1972!
> >>
> >
> > So we've missed the Thirtieth Anniversary (bit bad, that ;-(>
> > ... bottles back down to the cellar, etc.
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> Durrrrhhhh   .  .  .   Fortieth .... sorry had started one already,
>
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>



-- 
-- 
As of 1st October 2012, I have retired from the University.

These are my own views and may or may not be shared by the University

Dave Malham
Honorary Fellow, Department of Music
The University of York
York YO10 5DD
UK

'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130624/8975fbcd/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to