Greetings to All,
Just a few thoughts regarding recent posts and the argon-filled sphere.
Martin, I definitely boo-booed by suggesting the recording would be made in an 
all-argon atmosphere. But comparing the *sound* one might experience between 
the two conditions (air vs argon) might have been interesting.
I learned to scuba while in the military--this was during the Gulf War/Desert 
Storm. Most of what I learned regarding Boyle's law, Charles's law, and partial 
pressures came from two classroom lectures (this was prior to embarking on a 
college degree). Anyway, I don't believe breathing noble gases for a brief 
period and under normal atmospheric conditions would result in much more than 
momentary oxygen deprivation. The use of gas mixtures under immense pressure 
(deep sea diving) is a wholly different thing. Divers learn to ascend at rates 
that permit off-gassing and pressure equalization at the physiological 
level--it all relates to gases under pressure and dissolving in liquid (in this 
case, blood). What is far worse at normal pressures are gases (particularly CO) 
that attach themselves to the blood in the same manner as oxygen. A lot of 
people don't realize that CO is one of the deadliest gases there is, even in 
dilute concentration. Helium and Argon
 don't chemically attach to much of anything (hence their categorization as 
noble gases). On another extreme, climbers (K2, Everest, etc.) need time to 
acclimate to low atmospheric pressure (this goes far beyond oxygen needs). 
Without proper adjustment, extreme elevation changes can result in severe 
sickness or worse. Anybody up for making IRs in the Himalayas?

If someone wished to do hyper-real sound design for sci-fi movies, he/she would 
have to consider how we might sound and hear in alien atmospheres. But I guess 
Captain Kirk wouldn't have appeared too manly had he started talking like 
Mickey Mouse while in a rarified environment. Actually, the ideas of echoes and 
sound on distant planets might be of value... one of these years.
Lastly, I was happy to read Richard Lee's comments regarding the TetraMic and 
using it as a sound intensity probe. Never thought of using the TetraMic for 
this. Thanks, Richard, for the insights (and the many contributions you've 
made). I used to have a pair of matched B&K 1/4-inch mics that were for an 
intensity probe. The B&K mics were matched for phase as well as frequency 
response. Do the IRs included with the TetraMic compensate for phase changes as 
well as frequency response variations? Judging by the math (only a part of 
which I understand), I imagine they do.
Best,
Eric C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130209/3cb4c793/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to