Hello Dave,
Thanks for the note (re the sound of vision). In addition to my hearing 
research, I’ve been doing a fair amount of music recording. Here in the USA, 
spaced pair miking is quite popular, as is isolating instruments and then 
positioning the instruments via panning in the final mix. I’ve gone the 
direction of ORTF, Blumlein, mid-side, etc. to satisfy my own interest (and 
create my own opinions). I absolutely love the sound I get using the Blumlein 
Stereo technique with ribbon (generally Royer) mics. It really comes across as 
natural and, in the frontal plane, rivals Ambisonic recordings I've made using 
a borrowed Soundfield mic. The only issue I have with the Blumlein stereo 
technique, at least when it comes to recording stimuli for my research, is the 
reversal of sound sources picked up from the rear. If I was recording a jazz 
quartet in front of me (as an example), and not concerned about the direction 
of reflections in the rear plane, this would not
 be a problem. But if I desire to immerse listeners in a restaurant of 3D 
sound, the Blumlein technique isn’t the best. My solution to date: Ambisonics.

I’d use binaural recordings and matching HRTFs to subjects, but the problem 
here is that of fitting headphones over hearing aids or CIs. I guess what I’m 
ultimately after is the equivalent *HRFT* in the soundfield, and one that 
allows free head movement. The sweetspot doesn’t have to be large, as I don’t 
anticipate subjects to be bouncing around (parent consent isn't the only reason 
for not using children). I’m definitely against putting people’s head in a 
restraint (bit bar or whatever) because head movements are a part of natural 
listening.

When I refer to stereo as an illusion, I’m usually referring to the arrival 
time and SPL of two identical sounds emanating from separate (L + R) 
loudspeakers as being equal. The resulting acoustic wave or waves at the 
listener's head aren’t the same as the physical wave originating from a speaker 
located directly ahead of the listener. I’m fairly sure it’s mostly the brain’s 
integration of info, not physical waveform superposition, that gives the 
illusion that the sound is coming from inbetween the L & R speakers. In one of 
my studies that ultimately got published in Noise & Health, the stimulus sounds 
came from individual speakers--I didn't have to worry about wave field 
reconstruction. In that study, pinnae cues certainly turned out to be valuable 
for locating complex sounds: When ILDs and ITDs were maintained, but the pinnae 
obscured, localization errors weren’t ambiguous (judged by response time) but 
nearly always in error (the errors
 were front-back judgments, never lateralization errors).

With regard to your suggesting an anechoic environment with a standardized HOA 
speaker array and direct sounds coming from individual speakers: That’s pretty 
much what I’m shooting for! Oticon appears to be using a HOA system with (I 
believe) 29 speakers. But because I want to use field recordings of restaurants 
or similar venues, I’d need a HOA mic. Anybody out there used the Eigenmic, or 
know where I could get a sample recording made with one? Other suggestions??

I guess the good news is that my research isn’t costing taxpayers money or 
hurting anyone. It’s probably odd that I made hearing research something of a 
hobby: All of the work I do is self-funded and not-for-profit. I always have 
unanswered questions (and the list grows). But once I get things in place and 
do a pilot study, I’ll invite a few prominent researchers over to scrutinize my 
setup. I gave a colloquium some years back, and it mostly ended up with 
professors (and department heads) arguing with each other. But despite that 
ordeal, a few ideas came to fruition, and I ended up getting a research award 
from the American Academy of Audiology. That was a good spring board for what I 
wish to accomplish next.

I really appreciate that people put their time and thought into this list, and 
are patient enough to help someone like me.
Thanks again,
Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120604/4de27eaf/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to