Hi,

Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 03:51:03 -0000
From: "John Lundsten" <john.lunds...@blueyonder.co.uk>

IMO if one wants to store so called linear PCM, use WAV. All other formats offer less & only exist for (a) backward compatibility for which I have no problem or (b) to screw the customer, which I find obnoxious.

AIFF, AIFC, SD2, CAF, have no good reason to exist! (beyond some dodgy Commercial imperative to .....)
John L

The first three have existed for some time, and presumably there were good reasons for them being created. Apple showed interest in sound long before Microsoft. They fall into your category a).

SD2 has long been discarded for general use, but it is still desirable to be able to read and convert it.

AIFF to WAV conversion and vice versa is fairly trivial nowadays and both formats are generally cross platform.

AIFC has never really been in mainstream use, and the compression algorithms allowed in it have been superseded.

CAF is slightly different in that it is a container format that can contain many different audio formats and other data. Unlike .mov or .mpeg it is audio only, so possibly most useful for sample and loop libraries.

WAV itself, although adopted for compatibility and universality reasons, has been modified (BWAV, WAVE-FORMAT-EXTENSIBLE, W64, RF64), and may become obsolete. Nothing lasts for ever.

Being a long term Mac user, almost my entire collection of audio files are AIFF. I feel secure using it, and have never had any problem with the format, whereas some WAV files don't work with some applications and have to be converted

Ciao,

Dave.
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to