TED must be related to TLT:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tired_light_theory

With very long cables, even a few light years long, what happens?

--
Marc

Le Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:52:58 +0530,
umashankar mantravadi <umasha...@hotmail.com> a écrit :

> 
> havent you heard of tired electron distortion ? (TID). the electrons
> in speaker wire get tired moving back and forth and not going
> anywhere. the solution is to disconnect the speaker every few hours
> connect a battery one side and short the other, so all the old
> electrons can be flushed out (i think i read this in the wireless
> world) umashankar
> 
> i have published my poems. read (or buy) at
> http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
>  > From: neil.water...@asti-usa.com
> > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:20:02 -0400
> > To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Distance perception (really speaker wire
> > discussion!)
> > 
> > I wrote the following as a guide for internal use at my work-place
> > a few years back:
> > 
> > One "don't" that I hold close is this: Don't be mislead by the many
> > "snake oil and, smoke and mirrors" cable vendors that seem to imbue
> > speaker cables with magical (and astronomically expensive)
> > properties. No matter what Monster Cable, Audioquest, or Cardas
> > claim (or any other esoteric speaker wire manufacturer for that
> > matter), there has never been any proof in any unbiased listen test
> > that there is any benefit from using these "snake oil, and smoke
> > and mirrors" inventions. [I still stand absolutely by this
> > statement... if you are one of the sad souls that believe they can
> > hear a difference, then you deserve to waste ALL your money on
> > magical items - I have some acoustic candles for sale > they cost
> > $1000 each and you must use one per speaker in your listening
> > room.... the benefits are "when lit, you can find each speaker when
> > you turn the lights off"....).
> > 
> > The most amusing claim is that some speaker wires are
> > directional... yes, some manufacturers have decided that their
> > cables must be installed in a particular orientation (usually
> > indicated by an arrow printed on the outer jacket of the cable
> > indicating the direction from the amp to the speaker that the wire
> > is "designed" to be used. All sorts of claims are made trying to
> > justify this. However speakers are inherently AC (Alternating
> > Current) devices, and hence the electrons in a speaker wire spend
> > just as much time traveling in one direction, as they do the other,
> > so there is no fathomable reasoning that explains just how a
> > speaker cable can possibly be directional, well excepting possibly
> > being able to charge 10 times more to cover the cost of printing
> > the arrows...  In fact if you consider this claim further, the more
> > you realize the "wacko" aspect to this - if the cable truly did
> > work better in one direction versus the other, then the resultant
> > sound cannot possibly be an
>  yt
> >  hing other than distorted when the electrons are flowing in the
> > reverse direction!
> > 
> > Another odd claim heard for some of the astoundingly expensive
> > speaker connects on the market* is that 'normal' speaker cables
> > exhibit some resonance in the audio band, due to their claimed
> > transmission line properties (since it is common to model a cable
> > as an RLC network). While the RLC model is not invalid, the
> > (usually unsubstantiated) claim that the resonance occurs in the
> > audio band (most often mentioned is 1.5kHz), is very easily proven
> > through basic electronic math to be hopelessly incorrect, and even
> > for a long 50 foot 10AWG cable of quite humble specification, the
> > resonant frequency calculates out to be 2.02MHz (some 2 magnitudes
> > beyond human hearing)! In reality cables  DO NOT  resonate at all!
> > The model represented here is single RLC lumped circuit for
> > simplicity and is only accurate at audio frequencies for circuit
> > analysis. A speaker cable is actually a distributed element and
> > should be represented as infinite number of lumped RLC models. As
> > an infinite number
>   o
> >  f lumped RLC circuits are modeled becoming its true distributed
> > form factor, we see the resonance frequency go to infinity. 
> > 
> > In order to shorten this discussion the most basic don't is, don't
> > buy any cable that claims anything other than the simple design
> > goal of connecting an amplifier to a speaker.
> > 
> > So what does matter? 
> > 
> > The bottom line is that the speaker cable DC resistance should by
> > rule -of-thumb present no more than  5% of the impedance load
> > presented by the speaker, and hence the ONLY real issue of concern
> > is the resistance of the selected wire per foot. The speakers I use
> > most often have a rated impedance of 4 Ohms, hence we do not want
> > to see a DC resistance greater than 0.2 Ohms for the cable run. 
> > 
> > In general the distance run per wire gauge recommendations I use
> > are as follows:
> > 
> > Up to 40 feet : 14AWG
> > 40-60 feet: 12 AWG
> > 60-100 feet: 10 AWG
> > 
> > - Neil
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 27, 2011, at 8:03 AM, umashankar mantravadi wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > years ago (no decades ago) i found what a huge difference it made
> > > if the wires were reasonably thick, and cut to be exactly same
> > > length. cutting them to same length is problematic with eight
> > > loudspeakers (unless the amp sits in the sweet spot) but my next
> > > rig, in my own house, in bangalore next year, will have same
> > > length wires to all the speakers. umashankar
> > > 
> > > i have published my poems. read (or buy) at
> > > http://stores.lulu.com/umashankar
> > >> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:57:49 -0700
> > >> From: d...@dgvo.net
> > >> To: sursound@music.vt.edu
> > >> Subject: Re: [Sursound] Distance perception
> > >> 
> > >> On 26/07/11 3:41 p.m., Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> > >>> On 2011-07-26, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > >>>> I certainly don't want you to waste your money on fancy
> > >>>> speaker cables.
> > >>> Never thought otherwise. That's obviously never been what we do
> > >>> here. ;)
> > >>>> But resistance does matter, so a good cross section such as
> > >>>> 2.5 mm^2 puts you on the safe side.
> > >>> 
> > >>> What I was trying to ask is, what's the real problem with
> > >>> resistance, especially with regard to a passive speaker and a
> > >>> modern, A/B class solid state end stage? I mean, I don't really
> > >>> see cable resistance shifting their operating point much, even
> > >>> with feedback, within the audible range.
> > >>> 
> > >>> What is it that I'm missing?
> > >> I swapped out some lamp cable on the speakers of a stereo setup
> > >> some years back with some cheap stranded speaker cable I bought
> > >> at Costco. Each core of the cable was about 3 times the cross
> > >> sectional area of the lamp cord (each core of the speaker cable
> > >> was about 3/16" in dia). The distances were not great, 5 or 6
> > >> feet. The improvement in stereo imaging was huge. Previously the
> > >> image had wandered around between the speakers seemingly at
> > >> random, now it was rock solid at the point wherever it was when
> > >> I recorded it. _______________________________________________
> > >> Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> > >                                     
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL:
> > > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110727/2a25f5c3/attachment.html>
> > > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing
> > > list Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> > > 
> > 
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110727/bbcdd993/attachment.html>
> > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing
> > list Sursound@music.vt.edu
> > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
>                                         
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110727/54bed32c/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
> 

_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Reply via email to