Between £80 and £180 Uk pounds each more or less On 14 January 2011 17:00, <sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu> wrote:
> Send Sursound mailing list submissions to > sursound@music.vt.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sursound-ow...@music.vt.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Sursound digest..." > > > When replying, please remember to edit your Subject line to that of the > original message you are replying to, so it is more specific than "Re: > Contents of Sirsound-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer > (J?rn Nettingsmeier) > 2. Re: tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer (Franck M.) > 3. Re: Sursound Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (Aart Nienhuis) > 4. Re: tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer > (Ralf R. Radermacher) > 5. Re: Available UHJ encoders? (J?rn Nettingsmeier) > 6. Re: Sursound Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (J?rn Nettingsmeier) > 7. Re: Available UHJ encoders? (Dave Malham) > 8. good quality low noise yet miraculously cheap > cardiod/unidirectional microphones ? (Augustine Leudar) > 9. Re: good quality low noise yet miraculously cheap > cardiod/unidirectional microphones ? (John Leonard) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:47:47 +0100 > From: J?rn Nettingsmeier <netti...@stackingdwarves.net> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Message-ID: <4d2f3ac3.3070...@stackingdwarves.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 01/13/2011 01:29 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote: > > J?rn Nettingsmeier<netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote: > > > >> i'd like to recommend ssr to other sursounders on linux... > >> .... > >> apart from binaural, it does ambisonic, vbap and wfs rendering to > >> speakers (which i haven't tested yet). > > > > Does anyone know of anything comparable for Mac OS? > > > > I'm desperately looking for a replacement for Jeroen Breebaart's > > wonderful Isone Pro (Windoze only) for binaural headphone monitoring > > while recording in double-MS and other surround formats. > > i don't see why it shouldn't run on osx with jack and x11 installed, but > as it depends on GLUT, ecasound, and a number of other things (with > their own dependencies), building it might be a pain. > > > > -- > J?rn Nettingsmeier > Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 > > Meister f?r Veranstaltungstechnik (B?hne/Studio), Elektrofachkraft > Audio and event engineer - Ambisonic surround recordings > > http://stackingdwarves.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:04:53 +0100 > From: "Franck M." <mushroomac...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer > To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu> > Message-ID: > <c9553595.21898%mushroomac...@gmail.com<c9553595.21898%25mushroomac...@gmail.com> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > > > ??Ralf R. Radermacher?? <fotor...@gmx.de> wrote > > > > > Does anyone know of anything comparable for Mac OS? > > > > I'm desperately looking for a replacement for Jeroen Breebaart's > > wonderful Isone Pro (Windoze only) for binaural headphone monitoring > > while recording in double-MS and other surround formats. > > > > There is Longcat's AudioStage, marketed as an object-based 3D authoring > system, that runs on Mac OS and Windows. Not open-source at all, nor free, > though. > > It seems to include binaural, VBAP and basic Ambisonics renderers among > others. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:22:22 +0100 > From: Aart Nienhuis <a.nienh...@versatel.nl> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Message-ID: <20110113222224.394365611...@mail.music.vt.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > > > > >Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:36:39 +0100 > >From: Bo-Erik Sandholm <bo-erik.sandh...@ericsson.com> > >Subject: [Sursound] Available UHJ encoders? > >To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu> > >Message-ID: > > > >< > e023323b1ad21d44af70273b35e7501501080fb...@esesscms0356.eemea.ericsson.se> > > > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > > >I like the way a tetramic recording sounds in UHJ stereo but my work > >flow is not really convinient. > > > >I have a windows commandline encoder for B-format to UHJ that I use, > >but I have forgotten where I found it. > > > >Do anyone have a pointer to a jack enabled UHJ encoder, settings for > >VVMIC or a VST plugin that can encode to UHJ? > > > >At the moment I use Reaper on windows to record, but I can dual boot > >to AVlinux for processing. > > > >Regards > >Bo-Erik > > > >------------------------------ > > Are you familiar with Plogue Bidule ? > Take a look at my website http://www.dtsac3.com for more info. > Although not on the site because of it's rather limited use, we do > have an UHJAMB bidule, where UHJ is made to B-format and then to 5.0 > surround. It does a very good job on some of the old UHJ encoded CD's > from Wyastone.co.uk .......... > > regards, > > Aart > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:39:07 +0100 > From: fotor...@gmx.de (Ralf R. Radermacher) > Subject: Re: [Sursound] tu berlin/telekom labs soundscape renderer > To: sursound@music.vt.edu (Surround Sound discussion group) > Message-ID: > <1jv23jj.v8b9n915lmnoim%fotor...@gmx.de<1jv23jj.v8b9n915lmnoim%25fotor...@gmx.de> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Franck M. <mushroomac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There is Longcat's AudioStage, marketed as an object-based 3D authoring > > system, that runs on Mac OS and Windows. Not open-source at all, nor > free, > > though. > > > > It seems to include binaural, VBAP and basic Ambisonics renderers among > > others. > > Just had a look eat their website. It does indeed. Still, if I had that > much money to spend, I'd rather go for a Headzone pro. > > Isone Pro wasn't free or open source either but it did one hell of a job > for a mere 30 euros. > > Ralf > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - K?ln/Cologne, Germany > Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com > Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf > Web : http://www.fotoralf.de > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:54:22 +0100 > From: J?rn Nettingsmeier <netti...@stackingdwarves.net> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Available UHJ encoders? > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Message-ID: <4d2facce.9050...@stackingdwarves.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 01/13/2011 04:36 PM, Bo-Erik Sandholm wrote: > > > > I like the way a tetramic recording sounds in UHJ stereo but my work > > flow is not really convinient. > > > > I have a windows commandline encoder for B-format to UHJ that I use, > > but I have forgotten where I found it. > > > > Do anyone have a pointer to a jack enabled UHJ encoder, settings for > > VVMIC or a VST plugin that can encode to UHJ? > > > > At the moment I use Reaper on windows to record, but I can dual boot > > to AVlinux for processing. > > under linux, you can run jconvolver with the uhjenc plugin, sounds very > good, but introduces 2048 samples of latency. > and fons has recently added an IIR-based uhj encoder to the AMB plugin > set (with zero latency but likely some compromises in sound quality), i > haven't had the chance to test it carefully, but a quick run-through > showed it does the job, although i prefer the sound of the convolution one. > > so what i usually do is use either the vmic plugin or, in the future, > the uhj iir plugin for real-time monitoring during tracking, and the > convolution-based one for mixing and premastering. > > if you're on windows or mac, the AMB plugins will probably be easier to > build, since they have no dependencies, whereas jconvolver needs the > zita libs, which in turn depend on fftw3, which might be a bit tricker > to build. > > > -- > J?rn Nettingsmeier > Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 > > Meister f?r Veranstaltungstechnik (B?hne/Studio), Elektrofachkraft > Audio and event engineer - Ambisonic surround recordings > > http://stackingdwarves.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:56:32 +0100 > From: J?rn Nettingsmeier <netti...@stackingdwarves.net> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Message-ID: <4d2fad50.6010...@stackingdwarves.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 01/13/2011 11:22 PM, Aart Nienhuis wrote: > > > >> > >> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:36:39 +0100 > >> From: Bo-Erik Sandholm <bo-erik.sandh...@ericsson.com> > >> Subject: [Sursound] Available UHJ encoders? > >> To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu> > >> Message-ID: > >> > >> < > e023323b1ad21d44af70273b35e7501501080fb...@esesscms0356.eemea.ericsson.se> > >> > >> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >> > >> > >> I like the way a tetramic recording sounds in UHJ stereo but my work > >> flow is not really convinient. > >> > >> I have a windows commandline encoder for B-format to UHJ that I use, > >> but I have forgotten where I found it. > >> > >> Do anyone have a pointer to a jack enabled UHJ encoder, settings for > >> VVMIC or a VST plugin that can encode to UHJ? > >> > >> At the moment I use Reaper on windows to record, but I can dual boot > >> to AVlinux for processing. > >> > >> Regards > >> Bo-Erik > >> > >> ------------------------------ > > > > Are you familiar with Plogue Bidule ? > > Take a look at my website http://www.dtsac3.com > > this page tried to force a popup on me which was blocked, and another > which sneaked past the blocker and told me i was the zillionth visitor > to this website and could claim a prize by entering my cell phone > number. what the f...? > > > -- > J?rn Nettingsmeier > Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487 > > Meister f?r Veranstaltungstechnik (B?hne/Studio), Elektrofachkraft > Audio and event engineer - Ambisonic surround recordings > > http://stackingdwarves.net > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:52:17 +0000 > From: Dave Malham <d...@york.ac.uk> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Available UHJ encoders? > To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu> > Message-ID: <4d300ec1.7080...@york.ac.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > On 14/01/2011 01:54, J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > > > under linux, you can run jconvolver with the uhjenc plugin, sounds very > good, but introduces 2048 > > samples of latency. > > and fons has recently added an IIR-based uhj encoder to the AMB plugin > set (with zero latency but > > likely some compromises in sound quality), i haven't had the chance to > test it carefully, but a > > quick run-through showed it does the job, although i prefer the sound of > the convolution one. > > D*mn, I'm just finishing off a (VST/AU) encoder myself using an IIR filter > set based on the analogue > all pass filters in the original Calrec unit (as designed by Geoffrey)- if > I'd realised Fons had > done so already, I could have nicked his code and saved myself some > considerable time :-) > > Dave > > -- > These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer > /*********************************************************************/ > /* Dave Malham http://music.york.ac.uk/staff/research/dave-malham/ */ > /* Music Research Centre */ > /* Department of Music "http://music.york.ac.uk/"; */ > /* The University of York Phone 01904 432448 */ > /* Heslington Fax 01904 432450 */ > /* York YO10 5DD */ > /* UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' */ > /* "http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/"; */ > /*********************************************************************/ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:52:20 +0000 > From: Augustine Leudar <gustar...@gmail.com> > Subject: [Sursound] good quality low noise yet miraculously cheap > cardiod/unidirectional microphones ? > To: sursound@music.vt.edu > Message-ID: > <AANLkTikp9eEcuR=5pue9bghbvhibaob35pojgdas_...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hello - could anyone reccomend a good uni/cardiod directional microphones > for use with the tascam dr 680 ? I intend to strap about five of them > together to record surround for a bespoke installation (ie it doesnt need > to > adhere to a standardised ambisonic format or anything0 . I some may find > this a preposterous idea - but humour me - so any ideas for the microphones > ? I will be recording jungle sounds so they need to be low noise but i can > maybe get away with a fair bit as jungles are quite loud. I have my own > ways > of protecting equipment from humidity so that is not an essential facotr, > cheers, > Gus > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110114/27194e7a/attachment.html > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:24:28 +0000 > From: John Leonard <j...@johnleonard.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [Sursound] good quality low noise yet miraculously cheap > cardiod/unidirectional microphones ? > To: Surround Sound discussion group <sursound@music.vt.edu> > Message-ID: <7d5ee799-910f-4253-9321-1c250136d...@johnleonard.co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Can you specify a target price? > > Thanks, > > John > > > On 14 Jan 2011, at 15:52, Augustine Leudar wrote: > > > Hello - could anyone recommend a good uni/cardioid directional > microphones > > for use with the Tascam DR 680 ? > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > End of Sursound Digest, Vol 30, Issue 8 > *************************************** > -- 07812675974 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20110114/1c2ff4b4/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
