On 1/12/2021 12:33 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
> On 1/11/2021 6:08 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 1/11/2021 4:26 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
>>> On 1/11/2021 12:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>> David E. Ross wrote on 11/01/21 09:14:
>>>>> On 1/10/2021 12:08 PM, Ray Davison wrote:
>>>>>> I get a news letter from a doctor.  Twitter banned him because he
>>>>>> described his experience treating people with CCP virus.  He moved to
>>>>>> Parler and took 28K followers with him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now Twitter has banned Trump.  Trump moved to Parler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Parler used Amazon servers.  Amazon has banned Parler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Free speech anyone?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray
>>>>>
>>>>> The right of free speech in the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution
>>>>> only applies to government action, not to the actions of businesses and
>>>>> individuals.
>>>>>
>>>> I would have thought "free speech" would also give the provider the 
>>>> freedom *NOT* to reply to or even to carry an article!
>>>
>>> Given today's broad definition of "press", that falls under freedom of
>>> the press.  "Press" now seems to include not only print media but also
>>> electronic media.
>>>
>> No it does not. The 1st and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
>> *only* apply to Government action. The 1st applies to Federal Government
>> action, the 14th applies to state action.
>>
>> Regards
>> Keith N. McKenna
>>
> 
> I was replying to the comment that "free speech" gave newspapers and
> electronic platforms the right to carry or refuse to carry an article.
> That is not "free speech"; that is "freedom of the press".  Yes,
> Amendment 1 prevents the federal government from infringing on both free
> speech and freedom of the press, which was extended to the states by
> Amendment 14.
> 
> Someone once said the freedom of the press belongs to he who owns the
> printing press.  It has long been the answer to anyone who objects when
> a newspaper refuses to publish his or her letter to the editor.  Extend
> that to electronic platforms, and that becomes the answer to anyone who
> objects to being censored by Facebook, Twitter, or any other electronic
> medium.
> 
My apologies David. It is what I get for replying so early in the
morning for me. Also as a History major and Political Science minor in
college I decry the woeful ignorance of so many U.S. citizens of the
Constitution. We as a nation would be well served by bringing back the
teaching of Civics in our public and private schools.

Again my apologies
Keith
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to