Daniel wrote: > On 15/12/2016 6:40 PM, bdelmee wrote: >> Richmond wrote on 2016-12-14 22:51: >>> bdelmee <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Hello, I keep seeing people mentioning unofficial dev builds >>>> and encouraging us to try those and report any issue before >>>> 2.46 comes out. >>>> >>>> I am still using 2.38 as 2.40 had an annoying regression for me, >>>> which i'd like to check on the next beta and report if still present. >>>> >>>> But - will there be a beta ? 2.38 is 15 months old by now. >>>> Still works wonder for all i can see but security-wise, >>>> this is getting a little old. >>> >>> There are builds here: (I don't think they are 'unofficial', but they >>> are for testing.) Scroll down to 2.49a2. I have been using it without >>> trouble. >>> >>> https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-aurora/ >>> >> thank you Richmond, but i only see alpha versions in that folder. >> >> my question remains: does seamonkey still follow a release cycle >> including public betas ? >> > Yes, SeaMonkey does (normally) follow a release cycle that includes > public Beta testing, but the small team that produces SeaMonkey has been > having various problems (some derived from FireFox) and, of course, they > have their usual workloads and family to handle as well. > > The version Richmond gave you a link to *is* an Alpha version (hence the > "a2" at the end of the Version number. > > I think I downloaded an "official" Win7 WOW 32bit SM 2.46 recently, but > cannot locate it at the moment, so maybe I was just dreaming! >
It should be (officially just as a candidate, but unofficially as a release) https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/2.46-candidates/build9/unsigned/ basically.. candidate = unofficial soon-to-be-released-but-pending-processing release :P Edmund _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
