On 04/02/2016 04:44, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > Jonathan N. Little wrote: >> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> Jonathan N. Little wrote: >>> >>>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>>>> >>>>> And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting >>>>> from SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much better behaved. So if >>>>> the OP has a way of choosing Flash over HTML5 (assuming he has >>>>> Flash installed correctly), he might get better results. >>>> >>>> I would not want flash to run in a email either... >>> >>> Why not? Is it because you're opposed to HTML mail in principle >> >> Nope, not *static* HTML mail. Use it for my business all the time. >> >>> or is there something about Flash in particular that gives you the >>> willies? >> >> Not in a email, and certainly not with ActionScript. > > OK, you're clearly opposed to Flash in email, but you haven't really > said why. I can guess from your hint, but I'd rather have an explicit > statement of what you see as unacceptable.
Because there's a new vuln every other day, and that means there are a good number of 0-days out there! Just say no to executable code in email. Regards. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
