On 20 okt, 09:12, WIFT <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 17.10.2009 3:46, Russell napsal(a): > > > As an open source initiative I would wonder why anyone would want to remove > > choices and force an 'all or nothing' approach? That's more typical of > > companies > > like A$$ple, Micro$$oft and Ado$$e who use that to lock users into usingonly > > their product and make themselves wealthier as a result. It would be sad if > > the > > final release of SM 2.0 did not offer the same tradition of choice as in the > > past. > > Exactly my words, thak you Russell for saying that, now I see I'm not > theonlyone with that opinion. > > it is like the inability to remove radio from my car > and when I want to use another,... but the inability _not to use_ the > internal mail client > drives me crazy and makes me more like leaving SM at all. ....even when I set > another mail client as default, mailto links in SM (2 RC2) still > launches mail wizard from SM. Sad. > > Anyway, many thanks to all developers of SM for the big work that has > been done on SM 2.0. > (w)
I also would love to keep using Thunderbird. though in "Program installation" It is impossible to change to Thunderbird or an other mail client as default. The Seamonkey is more handy + quicker then Firefox, so I would have liked to keep using Seamonkey. I look forward to a possibility to install the Browser on its own again. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
