On 19 Sep 2017, at 9:54, Jacques Latour wrote:
Hi,
I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the
policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will
explicitly support IPv6" activities?
I think that this is out of the wg remit and shall be handled by IESG.
My guess is there will be many implications that the IESG will have to
deal with.
Marc.
Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft
"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09";
specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework
work should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature
rich vs. IPv4.
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: sunset4 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee
Howard
Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
To: MarcBlanchet <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
Lol
I know of no IPR related to this draft.
Lee
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Marc Blanchet
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR
related to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes,
was it disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
Regards, Marc, document shepherd
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
