On 8/17/17, 10:00 AM, "v6ops on behalf of STARK, BARBARA H" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>> The question I would ask is whether on-demand IPv4 makes sense. > >I think "on-demand IPv4" would be rather easy with PPPoE. Many (telco) >ISPs are still using PPPoE, and there's still a lot of equipment and >routers that support it. That’s exactly how it reads in the gapanalysis draft: it makes sense for PPPoE. However, I will argue to both working groups that we should find an operator who thinks this is a good idea. I hope we can get them to write it up. If there is no such operator, we should remove the section (or at most, footnote it as an idea somebody once thought of). Lee _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
