On 16 Jul 2017, at 20:28, Brzozowski, John wrote:
Folks,
Apologies in advance for the gratuitous cross posting (v6ops, ietf,
ipv6, sunset4, softwires). I hope, to you all, this is worth the
added email.
The draft below was written to provide the necessary documentation to
enable the IETF (the NOC, participants, etc.) to migrate to an IPv6
only primary network connection (Wi-Fi and wired) that utilizes
NAT64+DNS64 to access IPv4 only content. The request for IETF 99 has
been to have the primary “ietf” SSID adhere to what is documented
in the I-D below. I trust the motivation is understood. This means
that the main “ietf” SSID would be switched to be IPv6 only with
NAT64+DNS64 (at layer 3) per the I-D below. Given the that IETF99 is
upon us, this may or may not be entirely possible.
At this stage, the infrastructure preparations for IETF 99 should be
in place to ensure that the IETF has the necessary hardware for
redundancy and performance.
So, we are all seeking your input. Given the above, what would all
you suggest is tolerable for IETF99 as it pertains to the I-D below?
• IPv6 only per the I-D for the balance of IETF week?
• IPv6 only per the I-D for one or more days this week?
• IPv6 only per the I-D for the plenary?
• IPv6 only per the I-D for the next IETF meeting?
While I’ve been a proponent of IPv6 for a long time, including our own
open-source implementation of nat64/dns64, we shall be careful, so I
would suggest that for this week, we pick a day for experiment, say
wednesday, and then for IETF100, we have it for the whole meeting, great
accomplishment for 100!
Marc.
Please send us your feedback.
Regards,
John
+1-484-962-0060
-----Original Message-----
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 03:04
To: Marcus Keane <[email protected]>, Jen Linkova
<[email protected]>, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]>, John
Brzozowski <[email protected]>, Erik Kline
<[email protected]>, John Brzozowski <[email protected]>,
David Schinazi <[email protected]>, Stuart Cheshire
<[email protected]>, Jen Linkova <[email protected]>, Paul Saab
<[email protected]>, David Schinazi <[email protected]>
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00.txt
A new version of I-D,
draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by John Jason Brzozowski and
posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental
Revision: 00
Title: Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF
Meetings
Document date: 2017-06-30
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 15
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00
Abstract:
The purpose of this document is to provide a blueprint and
guidance
for deploying IPv6-only Wi-Fi at IETF meetings. This document
outlines infrastructure and operational guidance that operators
should consider when deploying IPv6-only networks using NAT64
and
DNS64 to support communication to legacy IPv4-only services.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
