On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > DNS64 really should just be made historic. It does not work with > DNSSEC. There has NEVER been a NEED for NAT64 or DNS64. They > provides NO BENEFIT over other methods. Every proported benefit > turns out not to exist.
(A) I find NAT64 to be a very convenient solution, and best of all it tests IPv6 functionality in apps, so I know which apps will not work on a v6-only network. (B) DNS64 works _fine_ with DNSSEC as long as you do the DNS64 translation _after you validate_.
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
