On 6 Oct 2016, at 21:16, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
On 10/6/16, 3:30 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]>
wrote:
>Despite how much I like all those ideas, I don't think we are
ready to have an IPv6-only IETF network.
>
>Unfortunately, there are many applications, VPNs, etc., which
will not work just with NAT64, because literals, etc.
Can you make a list?
Or, can we start a list, and have people add things to it at the
next meeting, so we can work to resolve them by the following meeting?
The idea is not to create a list, on the other way around, is to use
our “behaviour” to discover what are the apps or destinations that
we use and don’t support IPv6, to create the “list”
automatically.
We just need some kind of logging of everything using the DNS64 or the
CLAT, which means is not IPv6 enabled.
Nastygram. So make the default IETF SSIDs IPv6-only or (+NAT64) if you
want. Then have the ietf-legacy network, which would give you IPv4 and
a portal page “penalty” that you have to state the nature why you
have to use this network and can’t live on the default one. I’d be
so curious to see what happens when people finally have to start
thinking about it.. and open internal tickets .. It was great fun doing
it 6-ish years ago, ..
/bz
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
