Hi Wes,
The authors of draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis think the draft is ready for WGLC. In IETF93 there was a small clarification comment at the session, but I think we can wait until after WGLC to update the draft with other possible comments. Best regards, Peng From: sunset4 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George, Wes Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 2:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [sunset4] IETF94 session scheduling Sunset4 - The cutoff for requesting a WG session is a little over 2 weeks away (18 Sept). There has been essentially no activity on list or in updated drafts since last IETF, and this WG session was the one after which we were supposed to decide whether to continue with Sunset4 or put it on hiatus. Will the authors of the current drafts provide a status update on whether they are planning on having updated drafts ready for WGLC or ready for more discussion so that we can get a sense of the length of time we need to schedule (or not schedule as the case may be) for Yokohama? Please respond ASAP. Thanks, Wes Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail server, I have no control over it. ----------- _____ This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
