Hi, JF, Thanks for the information!
James > -----Original Message----- > From: JF Tremblay [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 8:11 PM > To: Huangjing (A) > Cc: [email protected]; GangChen; Tom Taylor > Subject: Re: [sunset4] WG Adoption call for > draft-chen-sunset4-nat64-port-allocation > > > > On May 5, 2015, at 3:11 AM, Huangjing (A) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Good to know more if you point me a reference of "port block > >> randomization”. > >> > >> There isn’t a reference. I might have coined the term a couple of > >> years back, not sure. This is basically the act of randomizing the > >> assignments of blocks instead or in conjunction with port randomization > within the block. > >> This could be a concept defined and discussed in this document. > > > > I think you are talking about the port block randomization algorithms > > similar > to those defined in RFC6431. > > Will add some analysis and reference > > Thanks for the reference, James. Interesting. I had in mind a > non-cryptographically random set of port, which doesn’t seem to be handled in > RFC6431. That would basically be a continuous set of ports where the first > port > is assigned randomly or semi-randomly (could be on block boundary for > example). This concept could be defined and discussed in this document, but > it’s just a minor point for discussion/improvement. > > JF > > _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
