Done, reference updated to RFC7422 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-sunset4-nat64-port-allocation-00
James -----Original Message----- From: Chris Donley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:15 PM To: Huangjing (A) Cc: Tom Taylor; [email protected] Subject: Re: [sunset4] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation-05.txt Confirmed - you have removed our IPR. One note is that our deterministic CGN document has been published as RFC 7422. Would you please update the reference in your next release? Thanks, Chris On 4/14/15 4:26 AM, "Huangjing (A)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, Chris, > >Could you please help to confirm the IPR issue? Thanks a lot! > >I am one of the co-authors. > >Best Regards >James > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sunset4 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George, >> Wes >> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 11:45 PM >> To: Tom Taylor; [email protected] >> Cc: Donley, Chris (Cable Labs) >> Subject: Re: [sunset4] Fwd: New Version Notification for >> draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation-05.txt >> >> Authors - >> >> Based on the discussion during the meeting in Dallas, please publish >>a new version of this with a slightly different name. We will not >>link the two in "replaces", and this will clear the existing IPR >>encumbrance. >> >> Separately, will the cable Labs folks confirm that the new draft does >>not have any of your IPR in it? >> >> Once this is completed, we will call for WG adoption. Sorry for the >>Texas two-step, but this was the recommended way to address the IPR >>concerns. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Wes >> >> >> >> On 9/29/14, 12:04 PM, "Tom Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Draft has been posted. Detailed changes as described in the response >> >to Lee Howard's review, plus deletion of the section on >> >deterministic CGN as agreed in Toronto. >> > >> >Tom Taylor >> > >> >-------- Original Message -------- >> >Subject: New Version Notification for >> >draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation-05.txt >> >Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:55:31 -0700 >> >From: [email protected] >> >To: Tom Taylor <[email protected]>, Weibo Li >> ><[email protected]>, James Huang <[email protected]>, Gang >> Chen >> ><[email protected]>, Weibo Li <[email protected]>, Tina Tsou >> ><[email protected]>, Jing Huang <[email protected]>, >> >Tina Tsou <[email protected]>, Tom Taylor >> ><[email protected]>, Gang Chen <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> >A new version of I-D, draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation-05.txt >> >has been successfully submitted by Tom Taylor and posted to the IETF >> >repository. >> > >> >Name: draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation >> >Revision: 05 >> >Title: Analysis of NAT64 Port Allocation Methods for Shared >>IPv4 >> >Addresses >> >Document date: 2014-09-29 >> >Group: Individual Submission >> >Pages: 19 >> >URL: >> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allo >> >cat >> >ion >> >-05.txt >> >Status: >> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocat >> >ion >> >/ >> >Htmlized: >> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation-05 >> >Diff: >> >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocat >> >ion >> >-05 >> > >> >Abstract: >> > This document enumerates methods of port assignment in Carrier >>Grade >> > NATs (CGNs), focused particularly on NAT64 environments. A >> > theoretical framework of different NAT port allocation methods is >> > described. The memo is intended to clarify and focus the port >> > allocation discussion and propose an integrated view of the >> > considerations for selection of the port allocation mechanism in a >> > given deployment. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> >submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> >tools.ietf.org. >> > >> >The IETF Secretariat >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >sunset4 mailing list >> >[email protected] >> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 >> >> >> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable >>proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject >>to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended >>solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is >>addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you >>are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or >>action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this >>E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. >>If you >> have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender >>immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this >>E-mail and any printout. >> _______________________________________________ >> sunset4 mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
