This is Ka Band. Not Ku SLA is basically a guarantee from the provider that a particular level of service will be met. Failure means penalties.
There's a single community gateway in Unalaska. The customer is Optimera. Jan 18, 2024 10:17:34 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>: > > Le 17/01/2024 à 21:57, Inemesit Affia via Starlink a écrit : >> I don't think the idea of advertising with the association of fiber is only >> about latency. >> >> Think "symmetrical link" which isn't common even for Enterprise satcom. > IT is true. That symmetrical aspect - upload speed similar to download > bandwidth, compared to a higher ratio ul/dl - is a great benefit in fiber and > ADSL for home users. Maybe the latency ratio could also be considered. >> >> >> Also the SLA. Wonder if we can test this link somehow. How performant is it >> vs the Ku Band service? Anyone has a connection to the customer? > > I suppose it is not yet possible to compare the SLA of starlink Community > gateways, since the starlink Community gateways seem not to be deployed > already. But I dont really know. > > Alex > > PS: > > I am not sure what you mean by the SLA aspect (service-level agreement). > Maybe you mean a form of higher reliability and stability of the user link. > > Ku band (12GHz-18GHz) is what typical starlink uses to end users. > > Starlink Community gateways might also use Ku band, I think. However, the > photos show these spheres of 'teleports' which probably use something higher > than Ku. I dont know what freqs these teleports use; and dont know either > whether the Community gateways will use that Ku, or use the D-band > (120-170GHz) recently reserved by 'ESSAFI II for starlink at ITU. > > Then there is this Starlink Direct which promisses data (maybe higher > bandwidths?) to unmodified smartphone users in year 2025, which might also be > used for communities, albeit much smaller ('tethering' WiFi technology). > That is at 2.6 or 3.6 GHz (unmodified smartphones). > > JIOSpace fiber seems to be at MEO altitudes and also for unmodified > smartphones,, hence around 2.6 or 3.6GHz. > > Do you think the 'SLA' of smartphones is high? > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink