This is Ka Band. Not Ku

SLA is basically a guarantee from the provider that a particular level of 
service will be met. Failure means penalties.

There's a single community gateway in Unalaska. The customer is Optimera.

Jan 18, 2024 10:17:34 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink 
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>:

> 
> Le 17/01/2024 à 21:57, Inemesit Affia via Starlink a écrit :
>> I don't think the idea of advertising with the association of fiber is only 
>> about latency.
>> 
>> Think "symmetrical link" which isn't common even for Enterprise satcom.
> IT is true.  That symmetrical aspect - upload speed similar to download 
> bandwidth, compared to a higher ratio ul/dl - is a great benefit in fiber and 
> ADSL for home users.  Maybe the latency ratio could also be considered.
>> 
>> 
>> Also the SLA. Wonder if we can test this link somehow. How performant is it 
>> vs the Ku Band service? Anyone has a connection to the customer?
> 
> I suppose it is not yet possible to compare the SLA of starlink Community 
> gateways, since the starlink Community gateways seem not to be deployed 
> already.  But I dont really know.
> 
> Alex
> 
> PS:
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by the SLA aspect (service-level agreement).  
> Maybe you mean a form of higher reliability and stability of the user link.
> 
> Ku band (12GHz-18GHz) is what typical starlink uses to end users.
> 
> Starlink Community gateways might also use Ku band, I think. However, the 
> photos show these spheres of 'teleports' which probably use something higher 
> than Ku.  I dont know what freqs these teleports use; and dont know either 
> whether the Community gateways will use that Ku, or use the D-band 
> (120-170GHz) recently reserved by 'ESSAFI II for starlink at ITU.
> 
> Then there is this Starlink Direct which promisses data (maybe higher 
> bandwidths?) to unmodified smartphone users in year 2025, which might also be 
> used for communities, albeit much smaller ('tethering' WiFi technology).  
> That is at 2.6 or 3.6 GHz (unmodified smartphones).
> 
> JIOSpace fiber seems to be at MEO altitudes and also for unmodified 
> smartphones,, hence around 2.6 or 3.6GHz.
> 
> Do you think the 'SLA' of smartphones is high?
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to