I think this common in that appointment of commissioners go through a political process. The FCC has a technology group, too. When I worked with them about 8 years ago, they had skilled researchers on staff and a highly skilled director. They asked good questions about engineering decisions, like what is limiting the number of mimo streams on devices.
Their physical facility is a bit dated, and they don't get stock grants. I respect the engineers I worked with for what they did. Bob On Dec 13, 2023, 2:38 PM, at 2:38 PM, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <nnag...@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: >I would love for Nathan to be here with us, and comment on that :-) so >I >will add NN list as well. > > >All the best, > >Frank >Frantisek (Frank) Borsik > >https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik >Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 >iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 >Skype: casioa5302ca >frantisek.bor...@gmail.com > > >On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:21 PM, Richard Roy <dickroy3...@comcast.net> >wrote: > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Starlink [mailto:starlink-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On >> Behalf Of *Frantisek Borsik via Starlink >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 1:26 PM >> *To:* Dave Taht via Starlink >> *Subject:* [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s RDOF >Application >> >> >> >> “*Elon Musk*’s Starlink was not the only major company to inflate its >> capabilities >> ><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2021/04/rdof-reverse-auction-criticized-google-makes-pandemic-gains-california-broadband-access-for-k-12/> >in >> RDOF bids. Nearly 100 bidders have defaulted since the auction, >leaving in >> limbo an estimated $2.8 billion >> ><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/06/what-happens-to-the-estimated-2-8-billion-in-rdof-defaults/> >of >> the $9.2 billion originally awarded. >> >> >> >> The FCC upheld another denial >> ><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-proposes-22-million-fine-against-ltd-over-rdof/> >> on Monday in the case of LTD Broadband, which appealed the >commission’s >> finding that it could not reasonably serve the more than 500,000 >locations >> to which it had committed. The commission also hit LTD with a $21.7 >million >> fine for its default. >> >> The commission’s two Republicans dissented to Starlink’s denial, >claiming >> they saw a path for the company to improve its speeds before the >first >> deployment deadline in 2025.” >> >> *[RR] The reason two lawyers “saw a path” is because they were >> bribed/conned into to see it. In my nearly 50years of experience >dealing >> with the FCC, extremely rarely are the people at the top in the >commission >> tech savvy. In general, they have NO CLUE when it comes to >technology … >> period! **JJ* >> >> >> >> >> >https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-upholds-denial-of-starlinks-rdof-application/ >> >> >> >> >> All the best, >> >> Frank >> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik >> >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik >> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714 >> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885 >> Skype: casioa5302ca >> frantisek.bor...@gmail.com >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Nnagain mailing list >nnag...@lists.bufferbloat.net >https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
_______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
