Noel Butler via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Despite my high level of respect for Geoff, he, and others like him, often
> talk things up to push things their way of thinking, we only need look at
the
> FUD they came out with in mid 90's about IPv4's imminent demise giving
I think you malign Geoff to no purpose.
Geoff Houston is brilliant in putting up well thought out strawmans
(strawmen? Strawpeople?), often with the goal of cristalizing what exactly we
don't like about them.
> It's also like the local water board here who last week came out saying a
> whopping 70% of people surveyed said they'd drink recycled water, of
course
> it was the local water board that conducted this alleged survey, because
>90%
> of the more independent polling shows a totally different story.
I've never seen such independent polling. I've seen water bottle company polls
:-)
If you think IPv4 is fine, then Geoff's architecture, with 0.0.0.0/1 being for
eyeballs NAT44, 128.0.0.0/3 for institutions and SDN and class C being
swamp/infrastructure should work just fine. The question is how to get
there.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
