By the way, I tried both STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin and
STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64.bin installers and I get:
./STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin
Preparing to install...
awk: insufficient memory for string storage Context is:
>>> <<<
./STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin: test: ) expected
[r...@blade6 install]# /bin/sh STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin
Preparing to install...
awk: insufficient memory for string storage Context is:
>>> <<<
STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin: test: ) expected
Thanks,
Pavel Tankov
OK, on the web site there are the following choices for installers:
Solaris 10+ (Sparc 64-bit) 64-bit 3.3.3
STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64.bin InstallAnywhere (Bundled JVM) 99M
Solaris 10+ (Sparc 64-bit) 64-bit 3.3.3
STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin InstallAnywhere (No JVM) 45M
Solaris 10+ (Sparc 64-bit) 64-bit 3.3.3 STAF333-solaris-sparc64.tar.gz
GNU zipped tar 16M
Which one do I need? From what you said, I'm assuming that I need
STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin, because I would like to be able to put
my Java version. And I need to be able to easily switch between Java 5 and Java
6 quickly because I test different in-house developed STAF services and some of
them require Java5, but others - Java6.
On the other hand, however, if I take STAF333-setup-solaris-sparc64-NoJVM.bin
then it should be no different from STAF333-solaris-sparc64.tar.gz, except for
the installer itself. Don't these two packages differ only in what the user
experiences during installation, but provide the very same files after
installation? Is there a reason why these two packages should differ in what
files they provide, since they are both without JVM?
Thanks,
Pavel Tankov
On 08.June.2009 19:34:32 Sharon Lucas wrote:
> Note that the 64-bit version of STAF for Solaris Sparc 64 (installed via
> the STAF333-solaris-sparc64.tar.gz file) provides STAF Java support only
> for a 64-bit JVM. So, a 64-bit JVM is required to use it. So, is the
> JVM provided in /usr/local/staf/jre1.6.0_14 a 32-bit JVM or a 64-bit JVM.
> If it's a 32-bit JVM, then that's the problem. You either need to
> configure it to use a 64-bit JVM or you can install the 32-bit version of
> STAF for Solaris Sparc which provides STAF Java support for 32-bit JVMs.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon Lucas
> IBM Austin, luc...@us.ibm.com
> (512) 286-7313 or Tieline 363-7313
>
> ----- Forwarded by Sharon Lucas/Austin/IBM on 06/08/2009 11:25 AM -----
>
> Sharon Lucas/Austin/IBM
> 06/08/2009 11:24 AM
>
> To
> Pavel Tankov <ptan...@axway.com>
> cc
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject
> Re: [staf-users] STAFProc unable to load any Java based service on Solaris
> 10
>
>
>
>
>
> Are there any errors in the JVM Log for the STAF Java service (e.g. post
> the contents of /usr/local/staf/lang/java/jvm/STAFJVM1/JVMLog.1)?
>
> Also, post the complete result from running the following on your Solaris
> 10 machine:
> /usr/local/staf/jre1.6.0_14/bin/java -version
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Sharon Lucas
> IBM Austin, luc...@us.ibm.com
> (512) 286-7313 or Tieline 363-7313
>
>
>
>
> Pavel Tankov <ptan...@axway.com>
> 06/08/2009 11:18 AM
>
> To
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> cc
>
> Subject
> [staf-users] STAFProc unable to load any Java based service on Solaris 10
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
> I have installed STAF333-solaris-sparc64.tar.gz on a Solaris 10 machine.
> That is the command-line installer - STAFInst. The command that I used to
> install it was this:
> ./STAFInst -noreg -verbose -acceptlicense -bin /usr/bin -lib /usr/lib
> Here's some info about the machine:
> uname -a
> SunOS t1000-1 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T1000
> STAFProc starts normally with it's default configuration. Then I tried to
> add a Java service and put the following line in bin/STAF.cfg file:
> SERVICE http LIBRARY JSTAF EXECUTE /usr/local/staf/services/STAFHTTP.jar
> Staf doesn't start anymore. The error I get is this:
> Error on Service definition, SERVICE http LIBRARY JSTAF EXECUTE
> /usr/local/staf/services/STAFHTTP.jar
> 27:Error constructing service, JSTAF, Result: Unable to connect to JVM
> Error reading config file
> I have a JRE on the machine, its in /usr/local/staf/jre1.6.0_14. Here is
> the contents of my STAFEnv.sh:
> #!/bin/sh
> # STAF environment variables
> PATH=/usr/local/staf/bin:/usr/local/staf/jre1.6.0_14/bin:${PATH:-}
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib:/usr/lib:/opt/csw/lib:/usr/local/staf/lib:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:-}
> CLASSPATH=/usr/local/staf/lib/JSTAF.jar:/usr/local/staf/samples/demo/STAFDemo.jar:${CLASSPATH:-}
> STAFCONVDIR=/usr/local/staf/codepage
> if [ $# = 0 ]
> then
> STAF_INSTANCE_NAME=STAF
> else
> if [ $1 != "start" ]
> then
> STAF_INSTANCE_NAME=$1
> else
> # Ignore "start" STAF Instance name
> STAF_INSTANCE_NAME=STAF
> fi
> fi
> export PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH CLASSPATH STAFCONVDIR STAF_INSTANCE_NAME
> Can anyone tell me what the problem might be?
> Thanks,
> Pavel Tankov
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> staf-users mailing list
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
staf-users mailing list
staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users
