Hi David,
     Thanks for the response. I now have a followup question again about queues.
     This is my scenario. I launch 4 processes in async mode with notify onend 
option using process service. Then I run staf local queue get wait <timeout>

      But immediately after that I launch 4 other processes in async mode with 
notfiy onend option using process service. Then I run staf local queue get wait 
<anothertimout>

        How do I ensure that process launched in the second set not end up 
getting into first queue.
Thanks,
Arvind


--- On Wed, 10/22/08, David Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: David Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [staf-users] Queue service question
> To: staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 2:16 PM
> You can use the QUEUE DELETE request to delete all messages
> in the queue. 
> So for example:
> 
> $ STAF local HANDLE CREATE HANDLE NAME MyHandle
> Response
> --------
> 198
> 
> $ export STAF_STATIC_HANDLE=198
> 
> # Execute a process with notify onend, and do a queue get
> wait
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 200
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Response
> --------
> {
>   Priority   : 5
>   Date-Time  : 20081022-16:09:58
>   Machine    : local://local
>   Handle Name: STAF_Process
>   Handle     : 1
>   User       : none://anonymous
>   Type       : STAF/Process/End
>   Message    : {
>     endTimestamp: 20081022-16:09:58
>     fileList    : [
>       {
>         data: The current date is: Wed 10/22/2008
> Enter the new date: (mm-dd-yy)
>         rc  : 0
>       }
>     ]
>     handle      : 200
>     key         :
>     rc          : 1
>   }
> }
> 
> # Now execute 3 processes with notify onend, and then do 4
> queue get waits
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 201
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 202
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 203
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Response
> --------
> {
>   Priority   : 5
>   Date-Time  : 20081022-16:11:39
>   Machine    : local://local
>   Handle Name: STAF_Process
>   Handle     : 1
>   User       : none://anonymous
>   Type       : STAF/Process/End
>   Message    : {
>     endTimestamp: 20081022-16:11:39
>     fileList    : [
>       {
>         data: The current date is: Wed 10/22/2008
> Enter the new date: (mm-dd-yy)
>         rc  : 0
>       }
>     ]
>     handle      : 201
>     key         :
>     rc          : 1
>   }
> }
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Response
> --------
> {
>   Priority   : 5
>   Date-Time  : 20081022-16:11:40
>   Machine    : local://local
>   Handle Name: STAF_Process
>   Handle     : 1
>   User       : none://anonymous
>   Type       : STAF/Process/End
>   Message    : {
>     endTimestamp: 20081022-16:11:40
>     fileList    : [
>       {
>         data: The current date is: Wed 10/22/2008
> Enter the new date: (mm-dd-yy)
>         rc  : 0
>       }
>     ]
>     handle      : 202
>     key         :
>     rc          : 1
>   }
> }
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Response
> --------
> {
>   Priority   : 5
>   Date-Time  : 20081022-16:11:40
>   Machine    : local://local
>   Handle Name: STAF_Process
>   Handle     : 1
>   User       : none://anonymous
>   Type       : STAF/Process/End
>   Message    : {
>     endTimestamp: 20081022-16:11:40
>     fileList    : [
>       {
>         data: The current date is: Wed 10/22/2008
> Enter the new date: (mm-dd-yy)
>         rc  : 0
>       }
>     ]
>     handle      : 203
>     key         :
>     rc          : 1
>   }
> }
> 
> # Now execute 3 processes with notify onend, and then do a
> queue get wait 
> followed by a queue delete
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 204
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 205
> 
> $ STAF local PROCESS START SHELL COMMAND date RETURNSTDOUT
> NOTIFY ONEND
> Response
> --------
> 206
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Response
> --------
> {
>   Priority   : 5
>   Date-Time  : 20081022-16:13:03
>   Machine    : local://local
>   Handle Name: STAF_Process
>   Handle     : 1
>   User       : none://anonymous
>   Type       : STAF/Process/End
>   Message    : {
>     endTimestamp: 20081022-16:13:03
>     fileList    : [
>       {
>         data: The current date is: Wed 10/22/2008
> Enter the new date: (mm-dd-yy)
>         rc  : 0
>       }
>     ]
>     handle      : 204
>     key         :
>     rc          : 1
>   }
> }
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE DELETE
> Response
> --------
> 2
> 
> $ STAF local QUEUE GET WAIT 5000
> Error submitting request, RC: 37
> 
> # Notice that the result buffer of the QUEUE DELETE
> indicates that 2 
> messages were deleted from the queue, and the subsequent
> QUEUE GET WAIT 
> times out.
> 
> David Bender
> STAF/STAX Development
> 8-1268 (512-838-1268) 
> IBM Austin Bldg. 903-5B002
> Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Arvind Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> 10/22/2008 03:43 PM
> Please respond to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> To
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> cc
> 
> Subject
> [staf-users] Queue service question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
>     This is my scenario. I issue 10 process commands with
> the options 
> "notify onend" option on my local machine. Then I
> issue command 
> staf local get wait <timeoutvalue>
> 
>   Now when 1st process finishes the queue command returns
> and that is 
> expected. Then I examine the result of the completed
> process. After that I 
> again issue the command 
> staf local get wait <anothertimeoutvalue>
> 
>     Problem happens when multiple process finish. Now when
> I issue the 
> command
> staf local get wait <anothertimeoutvalue> 
>     This is probably because it has the notification from
> the second 
> completed process. 
>      Is there a way I can clear the queue before issuing
> the command 
> again. 
> Thanks,
> Arvind
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move
> Developer's 
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK
> & win great 
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event
> anywhere in the 
> world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> staf-users mailing list
> staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users


      

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
staf-users mailing list
staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users

Reply via email to