I observed that STAF takes much more time - about 2.5 times - as
compared to the manual execution.

I am running a batch file ( around 500 test cases ) using staf on a
remote machine that takes more than an hour, and 17-20 mins otherwise.
Is that because of a lower memory utilization by STAF? Is there any
option to increase the memory allocated to STAF so that I can bring down
the execution time?


Many thanks,
Saneesh Joseph


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
staf-users mailing list
staf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/staf-users

Reply via email to