commit: 0f3c42f522dc1ad7e27affc0a4aa8c790bce0a66
From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:15:04 -0800
Subject: tmpfs: change final i_blocks BUG to WARNING

Under a particular load on one machine, I have hit shmem_evict_inode()'s
BUG_ON(inode->i_blocks), enough times to narrow it down to a particular
race between swapout and eviction.

It comes from the "if (freed > 0)" asymmetry in shmem_recalc_inode(),
and the lack of coherent locking between mapping's nrpages and shmem's
swapped count.  There's a window in shmem_writepage(), between lowering
nrpages in shmem_delete_from_page_cache() and then raising swapped
count, when the freed count appears to be +1 when it should be 0, and
then the asymmetry stops it from being corrected with -1 before hitting
the BUG.

One answer is coherent locking: using tree_lock throughout, without
info->lock; reasonable, but the raw_spin_lock in percpu_counter_add() on
used_blocks makes that messier than expected.  Another answer may be a
further effort to eliminate the weird shmem_recalc_inode() altogether,
but previous attempts at that failed.

So far undecided, but for now change the BUG_ON to WARN_ON: in usual
circumstances it remains a useful consistency check.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
---
 mm/shmem.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index dc12264..89341b6 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static void shmem_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
                kfree(info->symlink);
 
        simple_xattrs_free(&info->xattrs);
-       BUG_ON(inode->i_blocks);
+       WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks);
        shmem_free_inode(inode->i_sb);
        clear_inode(inode);
 }
-- 
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to