That sounds better! I'll close my PR. On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 11:44 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen < marc.nie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am going to make a PR myself for the main document. Using a custom > evaluator, as in Daphne's proposal, has the issue that some global > state (like the state of threads) is initialised anew for each > evaluation. Of course, it is possible to write a REPL that acts within > the dynamic extent of the `run' procedure but this is out of the scope > of SRFI 226. That said, I am fine with others adding code to this SRFI > in a `contrib/' subdirectory. > > Marc > > PS Thanks, Shiro, for proposing a wording! > > Am So., 12. Jan. 2025 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler > <s...@speechcode.com>: > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:32 AM Shiro Kawai <shiro.ka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I made a PR. Marc, is my wording appropriate? > >> > >> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-226/pull/9 > > > > > > Marc, what do you think? Note that Shiro's pull request applies to the > source code of the sample implementation, not to the document. >
