Am So., 6. Nov. 2022 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Shiro Kawai <shiro.ka...@gmail.com>: > > The handler passed to call-with-continuation-prompt is only called if the > continuation up to teh same prompt tag is aborted by > abort-current-continuation, correct?
Yes. > If that's the case, wouldn't it be more understandable to name it something > like abort-handler? I'll do the change. > > Another confusing part is that call-with-continuation-prompt takes an > argument named thunk, and in its description, it says "The default handler is > a procedure that takes a single argument thunk." This "thunk" is totally > unrelated to the former thunk argument; it might be better to give it a > different name. Okay!
