Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nie...@gmail.com> writes:
>>** 5.3 An iterator for the empty list returns <code>#f</code> and an iterator >>for the empty list. An iterator for a non-empty list returns the head of the >>list and an iterator for its tail. >>So, the iterators for (#f, '()), and for '() return the same two values? >>I am feeling an "off by one" error here. >I don't understand what you mean. There is no such thing as an >iterator for the pair (#f, '()). Sorry, I didn't formulate it clearly. If a list only has a single element, that is #f. This #f is its head, and rest is an empty list. Calling this iterator will produce ... an #f, and an iterator for an empty list. On the other hand, an iterator for an actual empty list, which has no #f as its head. Calling it will ... also produces an #f and an iterator for an empty list. >What would you suggest? >"current-exception-handler-stack" or "current-exception-handler-list" or just >"exception-handler-stack"? I find "current-exception-handler-stack more aesthetically pleasing :). >I am sorry again for the long time delay. As long as it is an excellent SRFI, it's worth waiting :). Thank you. -- Your sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf) (Laptop)
