Thanks for confirming Daniel
My issue is, that the call will pass a system with billing, which uses
the callid, to keep track of the calls.
I can live with running multiple instances in this project.
I also have a Asterisk in my system, which I use to generate new
callid's. I would like to take that one out of the loop, an replace it
with a Kamailio. But if I cannot branch and get different call id's on
the branches with just one kamailio instance, then it may just introduce
more trouble.
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Kjeld Flarup (Christensen) M.Sc E.E, Teknisk chef
Viptel ApS, Hammershusvej 16C, DK-7400 Herning
Telefon: +45 46949949, Telefax: +45 46949950,http://viptel.dk
On 2017-02-23 20:54, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 23/02/2017 12:47, Kjeld Flarup wrote:
I ran into the same problem. Just that I may have more than two parallel
forks.
Am I right, that I need a kamailio instance for each fork.
what kind of problem? The next hop is matching on R-URI or it requires
different Call-ID because of other reasons?
And indeed, if you need different call-id, I think you would need
different kamailios with topos and different secret parameter for them.
You can run them on the same system, just using different port.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
