Hello Daniel,
My setup is proxy all requests to freeswitch via dispatcher.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "volga629" <volga...@skillsearch.ca>, "sr-users"
<sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Thursday, 10 November, 2016 04:56:53
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher
Hello,
as I said before, the registrations have little to do with calls in sip, unless
there is gruu in use.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09/11/16 18:07, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I cleared registrations and tried again and issue still present.
Client reply with 481.
IP (tos 0x0, ttl 52, id 7731, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length
638)
client_pub_ip.49383 > proxy_pub_ip.llrp: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 610
E..~.3..4...c....E.\.....j..SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy_pub_ip
:5084;branch=z9hG4bK3ea6.0c594485bff5b216f30af0f6172cb2b9.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.18.130.24:5160;received=10.18.130.24;rport=5160;branch=z9hG4bKm80c0USSKv5Bp
From: "Test Extension" <sip:4...@sip.company.tld> ;tag=SXt3DQQ90a0Dj
To: < sip:4300@ client_pub_ip :49383>;tag=719973534
Call-ID: 1abc150b-2141-1235-b5ad-5254003e39bb
CSeq: 99019404 BYE
Supported: replaces, path, eventlist
User-Agent: Grandstream Wave 1.2.2
Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER,
UPDATE, MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0
Slava.
From: "volga629" <volga...@skillsearch.ca>
To: mico...@gmail.com , "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November, 2016 12:28:32
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher
Hello Everyone,
I changed dispatcher algorithm from 0 to 1 and start working as expected. Yes
group 0 is accepted.
route[DISPATCHER] {
if(!ds_select_dst("0", "1")) {
xlog("L_ERROR","ERROR: Proxy Mapping - Desitnation for $fd not found...request
dropped \n");
sl_send_reply("404","Desitination Not Found \n");
drop();
} else {
$var(did) = 1;
}
if($var(did)) {
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
#forward();
}
t_on_failure("DISPATCHER_FAIL_ROUTE");
exit;
}
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "sr-users" <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November, 2016 04:33:33
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher
Hello,
On 08/11/16 20:42, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Everyone,
My setup is kamailio as proxy with few boxes of freeswitch in the LAN. Having
issue with BYE when extensions register on different freeswitch boxes. Here are
some trace of the call.
Not sure if this tag= miss match or routing.
Dispatcher use group 0 with option 4 (round robin).
is group value 0 accepted? I think this may create problems if a function
returns the group in the config as return code -- iirc, this was changed maybe
for lcr or permissions.
On the other hand, the registrations are quite independent in SIP in relation
with calls. The BYE should be routed based on record-routing to the freeswitch
that was involved in routing initial INVITE, with no relation to new
registrations from end devices. Is the BYE sent to the freeswitch that got the
initial BYE.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov
28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
BQ_END
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov
28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
