Hello, the initial INVITE must be without a to-tag, so that's fine...
I will try to see the reason for the t_load_contacts(). Cheers, Daniel On 14/10/16 10:31, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: > Hi, > > I referred to the totag. Sorry if I mistook it for to field. > > regards > Ganesh Kumar > > On 10/14/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> On 14/10/16 10:25, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 10/13/16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Can you split the IF with t_load_contacts () || t_next_contacts () in >>>> two >>>> to see which one fails? >>> After splitting, I get this error. >>> >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>> siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global >>> id=1 T start=(nil) >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_lookup.c:466]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >>> searching: hash=9175, isACK=0 >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_lookup.c:424]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching >>> failed >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_lookup.c:648]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no >>> transaction found >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=2 global >>> id=2 T end=(nil) >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>> registrar [lookup.c:240]: lookup_helper(): contact for [balaji] found >>> by address >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: >>> <core> [parser/parse_rr.c:453]: get_path_dst_uri(): path for branch: >>> '<sip:10.1.0.4;lr>' >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: DEBUG: tm >>> [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we >>> are done! >>> Oct 14 08:14:01 infinicalls /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[35289]: ERROR: >>> <script>: t_next_contacts() failed >>> >>> The other one doesn't fail. And also, as the logs say, the "to" field >>> is also empty in the SIP requests. Any idea what went wrong? >>> >> Which message says that to field is empty? Or do you refer to the to-tag? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com >> >> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
