Hello Daniel,
I confirm that the phone receives 200 OK to the CANCEL and 487 to the
INVITE.
I will backport the tm module to the last two patchs, then, after make all
tests I will report back to you.
Regards
José
2016-06-21 5:33 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>:
> Can you try with master branch or backport the last two patches from tm
> module? I pushed two commits that should catch and handle better this case.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 20/06/16 18:14, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems it tries to generate an outgoing cancel for the suspended branch.
> I will check the code, likely there has to be added condition for this
> cases.
>
> Is the 487 reply for invite sent back? Also, the 200ok for cancel?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 20/06/16 16:38, José Seabra wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm attaching more logs to this email regarding to the issue on SIP
> CANCEL to an INVITE that is suspended.
>
> If do you think that i should open an issue on git regarding to this let
> me know.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Best Regards
> José
>
> 2016-06-15 14:42 GMT+01:00 José Seabra <joseseab...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> But when Kamailio receives a CANCEL prints the following error messages:
>>
>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354 ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:287]:
>> build_local_reparse(): ERROR: build_local_reparse: INVITE is missing
>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354 ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:494]:
>> build_local_reparse(): ERROR: build_local_reparse: cannot build CANCEL
>> request
>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354 ERROR: tm [t_cancel.c:310]: cancel_branch():
>> ERROR: attempt to build a CANCEL failed
>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354 ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1389]: e2e_cancel(): ERROR:
>> cancel error
>>
>> I'm handling the CANCEL in the script by the following way:
>>
>>
>> if (is_method("CANCEL")) {
>> if (t_check_trans()) {
>> route(RELAY);
>> } else {
>> sl_send_reply("481", "Call leg/transaction does
>> not exist");
>> }
>> exit();
>> ...
>> ...
>> ...
>>
>> Thank you for your support.
>>
>> Regards
>> José
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-15 12:15 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < <mico...@gmail.com>
>> mico...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 14/06/16 16:33, José Seabra wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Olle and Daniel,
>>> Thank you for your replies, After receive your msg I looked again to my
>>> script and i found the problem.
>>>
>>> I didn't configure the correct failure_route block and the failure route
>>> configured didn't print any msg on the logs, so I thought that it
>>> wasn't entering on failure route.
>>>
>>> Sorry for my mistake.
>>>
>>> Anyway, How should i handle the CANCEL sip msg to an INVITE that is
>>> suspended? (still related with this implementation)
>>>
>>> Just handling it as done in the default configuration file is ok -- the
>>> suspended transaction will be canceled.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com -
> http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
--
Cumprimentos
José Seabra
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
