Hello, On 14/03/16 17:39, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Actually I see I need to go to 4.3 to use the ds_default_socket parameter. ... and per destination by using socket param in attributes:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.ex.attributes Cheers, Daniel > > Will go to 4.3 and see how it goes. > > Thanks > > Jon > > modparam("dispatcher", "ds_default_socket", "udp:192.168.0.125:5060") > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: hunter...@hotmail.com > To: mico...@gmail.com; sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:59:51 +0000 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the reply, sorry I keep missing you ! :) > > I have added force_send_socket in the correct places now , and I can > now make inbound/outbound calls are required. > > However with dispatcher, when Im trying to send SIP options pings to > gateways defined, I see these errors; > > > RROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2564]: ds_check_timer(): unable to ping > [sip:10.70.0.72:5080] > Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core> > [forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no socket found > Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core> > [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found > for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080) > Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm > [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.70.0.72" > af 2 (udp:10.70.0.72:5080) > Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm > [uac.c:307]: t_uac_prepare(): t_uac: no socket found > > However this is only when the listening socket is the VIP, if I define > the true private local address to listen on, dispatcher works nicely. > > Can you set force socket for dispatcher module when using probing? > > Thanks > > Jon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined > To: hunter...@hotmail.com; sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > From: mico...@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:55:52 +0100 > > Hello, > > oh, forgot to follow up, as I read your response at some point. > > Are you doing force_send_socket() or $fs = ...? If yes, what is the > socket value you are forcing? > > The log message said: > > Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR: <core> > [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found > for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080) > > The socket listen in the rpc command output is udp:10.70.0.75:5060. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 08/03/16 11:29, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > Did you have any thoughts on this or is it more ip routing related > or ucarp configuration on the server itself? > > Looks like kamailio has it as a listening socket. > > Thanks > > Jon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: hunter...@hotmail.com <mailto:hunter...@hotmail.com> > To: mico...@gmail.com <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>; > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:31:29 +0000 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the reply. Yes its listed, however I see mhomed set to > no? however I have defined as on. > > socket: { > proto: udp > address: 10.70.0.75 > ipaddress: 10.70.0.75 > proto: 5060 > mcast: no > mhomed: no > } > > > ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found > for "10.70.0.73" af 2 (udp:10.70.0.73:5080) > Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm > [t_fwd.c:522]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't fwd to af 2, proto > 1 (no corresponding listening socket) > Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm > [t_fwd.c:1779]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: > failure to add branches > Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: sl > [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: > I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) > > Am I missing something? > > Thanks > > Jon > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > From: mico...@gmail.com <mailto:mico...@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:10:32 +0100 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined > > Hello, > > can you see if the socket lists includes the IP address giving > problems? Use the command: > > kamcmd core.sockets_list > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 02/03/16 10:14, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Using Centos 6.7, kamailio 4.2 and Ucarp I am testing multiple > VIPs on the same server and having some issues. > > > I have ucarp running, with 1 Public and 1 Private VIP > defined, and both are pingable and failover in a cluster. > > The Public is for Subscribers to Register with, and the > Private for Communication to the Asterisk media servers behind it. > > My problem is kamailio when started states its listening on > both the VIPS, however when I try and force_socket over the > Private IP address, it states > > ERROR: <core> [forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no socket found > Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR: > <core> [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding > socket found for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080) > Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR: tm > [t_fwd.c:520]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't fwd to af 2, > proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket) > > > This is when listening on the VIP which is 10.70.0.75 and I > also look to force_socket out of this IP. It just doesnt > work, however if I use the physical interface on the server, > that being 10.70.0.70, it works fine and forwards requests on > the Private LAN. > > I have added net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 to sysctl.conf as > well but no joy. > > If 1 VIP is defined I have no issue, its just with 2, has > anyone had this issue before ? > > Any help would be great. > > Many thanks > > Jon > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - > http://www.asipto.com > > > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router > (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router > (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://www.asipto.com > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - > http://www.kamailioworld.com > > _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router > (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
