Are you using Path with received parameter on KA Edge? Are bot Linphone behind the same NAT router?
Cheers, Daniel On 08/03/16 08:08, 张顺通 wrote: > my program structure is > > LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS > > KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server > KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here > > when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE > by TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by > UDP. > > when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP: > INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP > > KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE > INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT > Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT > > and LinPhone recive that INVITE. > > > *my question is:* > > LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER. > FS send INVITE: > INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP > and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE > INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B > Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT > > but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,*but KA_EDGE send the INVITE > to A' TCP connnection* > INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B > Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT > > > Someone had this problem?Is this a bug? > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
