Hello, friend.
Actually I set my rtpengine on a physical machine before I sent you my first
reply to you. Problem still exists.
Now I changed some iptables rules and I can get info from “cat list” under the
table 0. It prints these:
local inet4 10.109.247.87:30008
src inet4 10.109.247.87:30058
dst inet4 10.205.42.195:56220
stats: 14964 bytes, 87 packets,
0 errors
RTP payload type 0: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 3: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 8: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 9: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 101: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 105: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 106: 0 bytes, 0
packets
local inet4 10.109.247.87:30042
src inet4 10.109.247.87:30066
dst inet4 10.205.42.195:55744
stats: 77399 bytes, 68 packets,
0 errors
RTP payload type 96: 0 bytes, 0
packets
local inet4 10.109.247.87:30058
src inet4 10.109.247.87:30008
dst inet4 10.205.42.195:33875
stats: 14448 bytes, 84 packets,
0 errors
RTP payload type 0: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 3: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 8: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 9: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 96: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 97: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 98: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 99: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 101: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 102: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 103: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 105: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 106: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 107: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 108: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 109: 0 bytes, 0
packets
local inet4 10.109.247.87:30066
src inet4 10.109.247.87:30042
dst inet4 10.205.42.195:39177
stats: 34105 bytes, 34 packets,
0 errors
RTP payload type 96: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 97: 0 bytes, 0
packets
RTP payload type 102: 0 bytes, 0
packets
But I still got info like this:
Dec 26 18:29:30 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30383] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:30 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30403] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:31 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30375] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:32 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30375] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30382] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:47974
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30342] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:64642
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30342] Kernelizing media
stream: 10.205.42.195:64642
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30402] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:48421
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30382] Kernelizing media
stream: 10.205.42.195:47974
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30374] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:58668
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30374] Kernelizing media
stream: 10.205.42.195:58668
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30402] Kernelizing media
stream: 10.205.42.195:48421
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30375] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:58669
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30375] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30343] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:64643
Dec 26 18:29:34 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30343] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:35 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30375] More than 30
duplicate packets detected, dropping packet to avoid potential loop
Dec 26 18:29:35 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30403] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:36390
Dec 26 18:29:35 localhost rtpengine[2946]:
[79049NzkxNmM1ZjAyMDMxYTgyYTI1NzBmNzQxN2YyOWIzNGU port 30383] Confirmed peer
address as 10.205.42.195:34933
The video call is great without much delay or noise. So any reasons else?
Should I still concern about this log info?
> 在 2015年12月26日，03:32，Mititelu Stefan <fan...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> 1.In fact I am not quite sure about what you mean for the first question. I
> am running the rtpengine daemon downloaded from github, sip wise/rtpengine.
> What does 'dpkg -l | grep rtp' show?
>
> 2.There is nothing prompt on command cat /proc/rtpengine/0/list. The file is
> 0 bytes and empty.
> That means your streams are not kernelized and all the traffic passes
> through user space. I have never run rtpengine software on a virtual machine
> so I don't know if it should kernelize the streams in this case; you could
> try it. On real hardware, it should. Thus you should get rid of those errors.
> Check point '1.' and make sure that you have the necessary packages needed
> for kernelizing the streams referred in [1] (i.e. ngcp-rtpengine-kernel-dkms,
> ngcp-rtpengine-iptables) along with the rtpengine daemon
> (ngcp-rtpengine-daemon); those should be the minimum packages needed. Grep
> the README for "in-kernel" keyword for more info.
>
> 3.Our kamailio is using loose route.
> I was asking about "strict source" form README [1]. Nothing related to
> kamailio's 'lr=' parameter (if that is what you meant). However your problem
> is at point 2.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan Mititelu
>
> [1] https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
> <https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
------------------------------------
北京邮电大学网络技术研究院
网络与交换技术国家重点实验室
田军
+86 18810315790
mozillaf...@bupt.edu.cn
------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
