Hi again, Sorry, false alarm... We had a patch which disabled the callback from dialog to RR.
Regards, Kristian. On Friday 27 November 2015 12:54:50 Kristian F. Høgh wrote: > Hi list, > > Record-route on sequential requests doesn't have did/vsf parm. > > On initial INVITE, I call record_route() and set dialog flag. > kamailio adds the following RR > Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2> > > UAC sends a re-INVITE, containing the following route: > Route: <sip:178.21.251.54;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2> > I call loose_route() followed by record-route(), and kamailio adds the > following RR: > Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df> > > I've got a phone which updates the routeset on sequential requests (which I > don't think it should) and the did-matching fails. > Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential requests, when I call > record_route()? > Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0) > Is it wrong to call record_route() from sequential requests? > > Which way is the best to resolve the problem? > > Regards, > Kristian Høgh > Uni-tel A/S > *Kristian Høgh* Telefon: 4422 8822 supp...@uni-tel.dk[1] Gydevang 19 | 3450 Allerød www.uni-tel.dk [2] -------- [1] mailto:supp...@uni-tel.dk [2] http://www.uni-tel.dk
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
